Physical AI
Your devices already collect the data. We make them act on it.
Vibration, temperature, current, acoustics. Most plants are already recording all of it and using almost none of it, because the gap between a sensor reading and a maintenance decision is a piece of engineering nobody owned.

AI IoT Development
The situation
Before we start
Data logged, never used
Historians hold years of readings that no one acts on, because nothing converts a trend into a work order.
Maintenance on a calendar, not a condition
Fixed intervals replace parts that were fine and miss the ones that were not. Condition monitoring changes what triggers the visit.
A fleet you cannot update
Devices in the field with no safe way to push a new model become frozen the day they ship. Provisioning and over-the-air updates are designed in from the start.
What working means here
Signed first. Measured after.
The value of each one is set with you during scoping, from your data and your line. What does not change is that they are written down first and published against afterwards, pass or fail.
- 01
Lead time before failure
How far ahead of the event the system raised it, against your maintenance history
- 02
False-alarm rate
Tuned during the pilot so the first month does not train people to ignore it
- 03
Fleet availability
Devices reporting and deciding, including through uplink loss
How it is assembled
Stage by stage
Each one ends in something you keep.
- Step 01
Signal review
What is already being recorded, at what rate, and whether the failures you care about are visible in it.
- Step 02
Instrument the gaps
Sensor selection, placement and commissioning only where the existing data cannot answer the question.
- Step 03
Model against real failures
Trained on your maintenance history, so predictions are anchored to events that actually happened.
- Step 04
Roll out in waves
A pilot group of devices first, with the OTA path proven before the fleet follows.
- Step 05
Operate
Fleet health, drift monitoring and scheduled model updates under an agreed SLA.
Scope
What the work includes
- Signal review: what your sensors already produce and what is missing
- Sensor selection and placement where new instrumentation is needed
- Feature engineering and model development against your failure history
- On-device inference sized for the hardware and power budget
- Provisioning, identity and secure over-the-air model updates
- Fleet health: connectivity, device state, model version, drift
- Integration into maintenance and work-order systems
- Alerting tuned so the first month does not train people to ignore it
Deliverables
What you keep
- 01Signal and instrumentation review
- 02Trained models with validation against failure history
- 03Provisioned device fleet with OTA update path
- 04Fleet health dashboard and alerting
- 05Integration with your maintenance system
- 06Runbooks and rollout plan
Typical stack
Python · PyTorch · ONNX Runtime · MQTT · Modbus · Time-series databases · ARM / Jetson · OTA update pipelines
Construction · Vision
Zone and PPE monitoring across eleven active sites
Site cameras were recording for insurance but nobody was watching them live. We added edge units behind the existing camera estate to flag exclusion-zone entries and missing PPE, and routed alerts to the supervisor on shift.
Read the engagement- 11
- sites live on existing cameras
- 99.9%
- per-site availability
- < 4 s
- detection to supervisor alert
Start
How AI IoT Development begins
Fleet deployment $90K–300K+ · Managed fleet from $4.5K/month
Where an engagement lands inside its band is set by data readiness, integration depth, the reliability bar, evaluation burden, deployment constraints and usage economics. All six, explained.
Thirty minutes on the problem and where it happens, then a fixed-price pilot if it looks like a fit.
Scope a fleet deploymentFAQ
Asked before signing
Often not. The signal review starts with what is already installed, and we only specify new instrumentation where the existing data genuinely cannot answer the question.
Enough labelled events to validate against. Where failures are rare we frame the problem as anomaly detection against normal running instead of prediction, and say so up front.
Signed artefacts over a staged rollout: a canary group, then waves, with automatic rollback on health regression. On restricted sites this runs through your controlled-media process instead.
Devices decide locally and buffer results. The uplink carries structured events and model updates, so intermittent connectivity delays reporting rather than stopping the system.
Often paired with
Where this fits with the rest
- 01Physical AI
Edge AI & Computer Vision
Detection, inspection, tracking and safety on-device. Milliseconds, and no network dependency.
- 02Operate
Managed Edge & Model Fleet
Drift, retraining, OTA rollout, device health and uptime reporting, under an agreed SLA.
- 03Physical AI
Vision Systems Integration
Cameras, optics, lighting, enclosures, and the PLC, SCADA and MES interfaces that make results act.